Why? I played Mass Effect 3, took me 25 ish hours, was REAL happy with the money I spent on it. No different with CoD.Originally Posted by goh13
COD4
Lieutenant General II
Why? I played Mass Effect 3, took me 25 ish hours, was REAL happy with the money I spent on it. No different with CoD.
Corporal I
Slow? Are you sure you were playing the right game, every map on mw3 is the size of a shoe box with a few hallways thrown in. I have never experienced this slowness you speak of.
If you're not playing for fun, then why even play?
Prestige 10
I'm sure, it looked like trash and had horrid animations, had to be MW3.
Corporal I
Hahahaha guess you have a point.
If you're not playing for fun, then why even play?
Corporal I
Nah WaW was. Go ahead flame on.
If you're not playing for fun, then why even play?
Lieutenant General II
sure will do
Staff Sergeant
While it might not be really slow, there is an undeniably sluggishness to it and no lightweight perk.
Corporal I
Hahahahahasure will do
If you're not playing for fun, then why even play?
Lieutenant General
WaW is basically a CoD2 mod for CoD4 and the player base is just horrible. Every time I play I'm the only person that doesn't have juggernaut, martyrdom or second chance on every class.
It's an okay game but Treyarch actually did little to nothing and I think claiming it's the best CoD game is a bit insulting to the truly great games in the series...
Corporal I
I never said it was a fact that WaW was the best in the series. But it's the one I had the most fun and enjoyed the most out of all them, therefore it's the best one imo. Plus I like the WW2 theme better than all the futuristic made up war mumbo jumbo that has been plaguing FPS war games lately. And you cant judge the player base by what you see in WaW today, the game's old for christ's sake and 3 new cod's have come out since then. In it's heyday it was a blast for me.
If you're not playing for fun, then why even play?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote